Local Wind/Gust Plots
Unfortunately, there is no publicly available recorded wind plot. The nearest accessible plot is located in a valley just south of the resort. In back-testing with weather models there is a correlation the resort and this lower station. Interpolation of speeds would be higher at the resort. Two days before the incident, gust speed and timing run somewhat parallel to resort forecasted wind. At the time of the incident (at this station) notice, gusts no longer parallel steady-state wind and extreme direction changes at the incident time.
-Yellow bar is incident time-
Forecast Model Available
Using the HRRR - High Resolution Rapid Refresh forecast model covering 2.56 x 2.56 km gridded land size.
Wind is referenced as: Gusts @ 33’, Wind Speed @ 33’ AGL, 260’ AGL, 9900’el. The resort covers 4 grids.
In 18 hours the resort could utilize 1,848 HRRR wind forecasts.
Local Wind/Gust Plots
Due to digital mapping limitations in mountainous terrain, the speed must be interpolated. For that reason, the simple HRRR based National Weather Service three times daily forecast must be adjusted – it will not be accurate unless this is done.
HRRR Grid with Ropeway Location
Chart shows: grids, elevations, wind forecast levels, resort elevations (green line) and Triple chairlift elevations. An interpolation shows gust speed two grids away could be more representative in this terrain. This interpolation is very common in mountainous terrain that shoots above the model’s average elevation. Notice the ropeway covers 2 grids, also these are well above grid forecast elevation.
Local Gust Effects
In gust evaluation three atmospheric levels should be considered. At higher speeds, lower level terrain influence becomes less significant.
HRRR Gust Forecasts Surrounding Incident Time
The image below shows the HRRR Grid “blocks” with gusts colors and speeds without interpolation. The forecast was produced around midnight. The forecast is for 8AM. Resort is circled.
HRRR Gust Forecast 12 Noon
This forecast was produced at 11 AM for 12 Noon. A faint topo map is underlaid, as seen elevation interpolation/correction would be needed – see above. The top of the ropeway is circled. Speed forecasted without interpolation is around 55 mph.
Ensemble Gust Forecasts
With any forecast it’s important to examine if this was a “quick ramp-up” event, impossible to forecast or if there is model error. The general rule for accuracy is: same grid same speed in 3 consecutive hours equals high accuracy. The forecast chart below is an “ensemble” of 10 slightly different models called HREF High Resolution Ensemble Forecast. This model has been available since 2017. The forecast references every hour, 48 hours before the incident. HREF also must be interpolated. The gust chart was produced 60 hours before the incident. Speeds are +70 mph.
HREF 56 Hours Before Incident
Below is the HRF 56 hours before the morning of the incident, same “ramp-up” of wind with a little larger portion above 70 mph.
HREF - 39
Moving into a window of better accuracy, this chart was produced 39 hours before the 9AM opening showing speeds at 75 mph.
HREF -27
27 hours before the 9AM opening, speeds shown at 60 mph.
HREF -3
3 hours before the 9AM opening, speeds at 60 with some at 70 mph.
Chart Option - Simple Line Graph
Those with challenges of color differentiation, the chart below covers the same HRRR model and produces a line graph of forecasts. Within that chart is the: model, elevation, time and 6 different wind forecasts. The sample chart below shows gusts in circles and is produced by SPOTWX.com.
SPOTWX - Grid Locator
Grid locator is over the resort, different models with grid sizes are shown.
Wind Force vs Wind Speed
Wind Force is a much better example than speed for reactions with ropeways. Strictly speaking; gusts produce the wind force that can cause a derailment. Wind force and speed do not parallel each other. Looking at speed gauge can give you a false sense of security. 70mph=13lb/sqft 35mph=3lb/sqft
Weather Summary
48 hours before the incident: the gust arrival, duration and speed were characteristic of the forecast and did not significantly deviate in those 48 hours.
The Structure of the Incident
Potential Factors to the Incident
Wind Operation
When operating in wind, the supervisor must take into consideration types of wind and its forces. There is intrenched old-timey thinking that you can reliably forecast gusts by steady-state wind speed. That thinking is not true. This is just one of the few reasons forecasters issue separate gust forecasts from steady-state wind. Gusts do not always mirror steady-state wind. Since predicting gusts from steady-state wind cannot-be-done, a forecast must be used. Past incidents have also shown gusts can force a rope from a sheave assembly while not running and gusts have forced riders from carriers.
Recommendations
To the Industry
Oversight agencies:
Manufacturers
Resort
Summary
The normalization of deviance of this type of incident started many decades ago. Ropeway wind incidents causing damage and death is well documented. Early evidence this author found was a repair by Byron Riblet of a ropeway damaged by gusts in Oregon in 1898. Its quite possible the wrong chart and no consideration for corrections were used in the forecasts; this would have greatly reduced the forecast speed and timing. There are many ways to view a forecast. One does not need to be a meteorologist to establish a gust trend that morning. A simple line chart would show the trend that was to occur. Ropeway technicians cover two different roles in ropeway operation – they can be regarded as the mechanic and the pilot. As a pilot they must also have training in understanding severe weather. Currently, there is no requirement for formal training in ropeway operations and no free access to vetted ropeway information is available. At this point there is some truly tragic irony that ropeways are tested periodically but ropeway technicians are not. Riding ropeways is a high-risk endeavor. Those risks have all been mitigated and with proper maintenance, no variables to higher risk will exist…with the exception of operations in wind. Accordingly, one needs to take the steps to understand the risk and then apply that knowledge to daily ropeway operations.
The risk can be evaluated by the TREE principle: Technician, Ropeway, Environment, External Factors
A review can then be used to show what factors are applied to establish a level of risk for that circumstance and what factors could be changed to lower that risk.
There is an old saying that rings true with ropeways – Everything Matters. You must employ all safeguards with every detail of ropeway operation because ultimately it serves the public.
References:
Analytical Review of Ropeways - Gottfried Hofmann
ANSI “B77” - Ropeway Standards
CalTOPO – Mapping Toolkit
FAA – Risk Management
Grid Overlays – NOAA Grid Toolkit, Google Earth
HRRR – NOAA Global Systems Laboratory, Ventusky, Utah University HRRR archive, Mesowest
HREF – NOAA Storm Prediction Center
LMOE - Regional ropeway discussions
MetED - Comet Weather Training
NCEP – Chart Tool
NWS – Daily forecasts
OITAF NAC – International ropeway discussions
OSHA – Risk Management
PNSAA – Regional ropeway discussions
Society of Ropeway Technicians SORT – Internal data: training and incidents
SPOTWX – Model grid forecast line charts
USFS – Manual 7300 Chapter 7320
Ventusky - Grid, Number, Color charts
WunderGround – Surface chart archive
This report does not cover: carrier swing dynamics, catenary curve, force diagrams, local terrain flow, passenger area, profile angle, rope tension factors, sheave liner wear, span swing characteristics, tower load, wind pressure correction factors – it is assumed a combination of factors are well past their limits when a rope derails…
Report edits will be a different font color -
Copyright © 2025 Society of Ropeway Technicians - All Rights Reserved.